Daikstra

The case

The store still has a digital gap.

Shoppers already use digital tools before and during a store visit. Once they are inside, finding products, getting information, seeing relevant offers, and moving through the aisle are still fragmented. Daikstra puts those capabilities in the cart.

01 · Shopper friction

Wanted it. Could not find it. Left.

In iVend Retail's 2018 global survey of 2,250 consumers, 67.3% of respondents who had left a store without buying cited being unable to find what they needed. Every missed purchase represents potential lost revenue, and across the trillion-dollar retail industry, even a small fraction of these missed opportunities can translate into billions in unrealized sales.

Read the survey

02 · Digital inside a physical store

60.1% used a phone in store

They are already looking for a digital layer. The store is not providing one.

Bring the interface to the trip

Search, route, and offers live on the cart instead of across a phone, a site, and a sign.

The journey is already digital

Researched online before buying in store91.4%
Browsed in store before buying online83.8%
Responded to offers through social media68.2%
Responded because they saw something they wanted33.7%

Same 2018 iVend Retail survey. Useful evidence of a digital and physical journey, not a claim about grocery stores in 2026.

03 · Offers where the decision happens

8.1% Higher purchase probability
16.6% Higher daily spend. Not in-store.

Closer ads. Higher purchase probability.

In-store digital signage increased the chance of buying featured products by 8.1% on average. The lift was stronger near the product, later in the day, and on weekends.

A separate restaurant social and mobile ad test found time targeting raised daily purchase amounts by about 16.6% versus a non-targeted control. That is not a smart-cart or in-store result. It shows timing can move spend.

One study is in-store digital ads. The other is time targeting. The cart can put the offer in front of the shopper, near the item, when it matters. That is the design. Not a result we have measured yet.

8.1% Herhausen, de Jong & Grewal, Journal of Marketing (2026). In-store digital signage, 237 field experiments, ~30 million shoppers. Lift in purchase probability for featured products, not sales or profit. Read the study.

16.6% Frontiers in Psychology (2022), restaurant Facebook and mobile ads, 50 intervention days, 9,650 dine-in transactions. Daily purchase amounts averaged $4,123.05 in temporal-targeting periods versus $3,536.44 in control periods. Not smart-cart or in-store advertising. Read the study.

04 · The missing data layer

E-commerce

  • Search behavior
  • Product views
  • Ad impressions
  • Clicks
  • Abandoned carts

Physical retail

  • Transactions
  • Limited journey visibility
  • Limited search visibility
  • Fragmented engagement data

Daikstra

  • Cart movement
  • Traffic & heatmaps
  • In-store search
  • Ad impressions
  • Ad conversions

Navigation gives shoppers a reason to use the screen. Retail media monetizes that engagement.

Talk about a no-cost pilot.